Sex in the City beat out Indiana Jones for biggest movie in America this past weekend. $55 million, 85% of the ticket buyers female. Apparently the big numbers took Hollywood execs by surprise. Interesting post over at Vulture, which not only analyzes the industry's reluctance to acknowledge women as a valued market, but pronounces Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, and Charlotte as Superheroes (because they protect each other from bad men.) Clever...
Hollywood's mystified response to Sex and the City's
$55 million opening weekend — who knew women liked to see movies with
their friends? — proves once again that despite being more than half
the population, women are still a niche market in the movie business.
After helpfully identifying which moviegoers contributed to SATC's success ("women"), bewildered Hollywood number-counter Paul Dergarabedian added, "This was to women what Indiana Jones and Star Wars, let's say, are to men." The only people who aren't surprised at SATC's summer-blockbuster numbers are women.
Still -- Superheros they may be -- but Carrie & Company's Marvel Universe of New York City has always been pretty much white, devoid of brown people, in no way even a meek reflection of the city's actual cultural and ethnic diversity. Apparently (I have yet to see the movie -- and, yes, I'm gonna -- I'm a big fan of the so-called, much maligned chick flick) the film version of SATC attempts to rectify the retro gringo TV fantasy with the best way Hollywood knows how: the sassy black girlfriend. As posted in the Root...
After six seasons, a couple of power lesbians, a naked Blair
Underwood, contract negotiations, false starts and four years of
abstinence, the city will finally get some color in the full-figured
form of Jennifer Hudson.
The 26-year-old Oscar winner
will play a new character—little Louise from St. Louis, Carrie's "young
and inexperienced, but still label-savvy assistant." Booooo!
All Sex and the City
evangelists know there is one fatal flaw with the show that launched
the sale of a thousand Manolos; The New York City that HBO gave us was
monochromatic, lily white. Unless you count bright spots with Miranda's
former lovah Dr. Robert Leeds (Blair Underwood) and a few lipstick
lesbians who showed Charlotte a good time in season two, SATC has never been the place to seek affirmative action in bed.
The black best friend, of course, nothing new. And, as always, serving a particular servile function, with no agency all their own, not to mention an individual storyline. As The Root continues in their blog...
Still, Hudson's character, though fresh-faced, unexpected and
significant, appears to be fairly predictable. Louise, with her curly
black 'do and dizzy plaid boots, has a specific function in the
film—helping Carrie get her crap together after a bad break up.
Basically she is the perfect pocket life coach.
Again, nothing new. Referenced in the Root post is this must-read LA Times article from last year by Gregg Braxton, which delves deeper into the Black Best Friend. Braxton describes the phenom as a second banana character "played by an African American actress whose character’s principal
function is to support the heroine, often with sass, attitude and a
keen insight into relationships and life." This would be comical if it wasn't so sad. Again, from Braxton's piece...
But on a more serious note, the trend of BBFs underscores the limitations that African American actresses still face more than five years after Halle Berry's Oscar-winning performance as best actress in a leading role for
“Monster’s Ball.” Despite impressive r�sum�s, solid credentials and
successful achievements, many of the black actresses who have played BBFs
are rarely offered the heroine role in mainstream projects. Not one
black actress will star in a prime-time series on the four major
networks this fall season.
And, as has been long lamented, lead roles in films are few and far between.
Over on the Latina front, all things representational aren't any better. Actually, they're worse. At least black actresses get parts in movies. Brown people can't even get them made.
Writer Alicia Valdes-Rodriguez, for example, has been trying to get her book The Dirty Girl's Social Club made into a Hollywood movie. Her script of her novel was sent by her producers to all the major studios. All of them passed on the project. And she has a few opinions of why it happened. In the latest of her series of video posts updating her fans on the project's development, Valdes-Rodriguez blames ignorance by "the studio execs" (read "rich white guys") on their lack of interest in the project. Seems the myopic bastards were put off with what Valdes-Rodriguez claims are her complex Latina characters (read "latinas who are not maids.") The execs, apparently, could not read them as "real latinas." Whatever that means.
It's a seven minute semi-rant, not without its salient points. See video here. And I was with V-R on more than a few of her arguments until homegirl touted Greg Nava's recent straight-to-video mess movie Borderland as "great." An example of a model Hollywood Latino project? A movie brown filmmakers should aspire to emulate? Hm. I rented Borderland. And it was bad. Nothing more than the corny Nava cinematic aesthetic coupled with a self-indulgent, self-congratulatory, exploitive J Lo star vehicle draped over the real horrors of the murders of the young women of Juarez. Not to mention its meandering and confusing plot and bad "noble" acting. If this is the epitome of Brown Film give me Cheech and Chong any day.
Perhaps -- and this doesn't necessarily apply to Dirty Girls Social Club (I haven't read it, nor have I read the screenplay) -- but perhaps Hollywood is turning down Latino scripts because they are just not good. Granted, a legitimate complaint on a double standard can be made given Hollywood's daily greenlighting of bad white movies, but I'd like to think our standards should be higher than, say, the latest Adam Sandler movie. I'm just sayin'.
Apologies for the long post. But if you've read this far I'm sure you won't mind a last couple of paragraphs, especially if its an example of some good writing, a welcome palate-cleansing change of pace after the Greg Nava bad moviemaking detour. Again, from the Vulture post, about the the Sex in the City girls as Superheroes, and the double standard applied to chick flicks...
Superheroes exist outside the laws and boundaries the rest of us
have to abide by; while men want to see themselves flying and fighting,
women are more interested in pushing other limits. How old can you be
and still be hot? How many times can you break up and still be in love
with someone? How many hours of the day can four working women
conceivably spend together?
Pointing out that Carrie could never afford her apartment, let alone
her wardrobe, is about as useful as questioning Robert Downey Jr.'s
ability to create cold fusion in a cave in Afghanistan — it misses the
point of the movie entirely. Why is it okay for Iron Man to collect
expensive cars but materialistic for Carrie to collect shoes? Surely
her carbon footprint is the smaller of the two. Politely, we don't ask
what the Hulk says about American men and their relationship to rage,
so why should we tolerate attacks on Samantha's legendary libido? Sam
Jones is no more a real cougar than Dr. Jones is a real archaeologist,
but they're both good summer fun. So wise up, Hollywood, and start
giving us some more female superheroes. And please, take a hint from Sex and the City, and dress them in Vivienne Westwood, not vinyl.
As Stan "the Man" Lee would put it, "'Nuff said."