Another Secret History
Carolina Gonzales from the very fine Soundtaste blog posted an interesting story in the context of the California Supreme Court's decision this week to allow gay marriages. Another Secret History, and another example of my theory that if you throw a rock at most any historical social and/or political event in U.S. history and you'll hit a brown person. Carolina's post is too delicious not to post in its entirety:
I have to admit, I only read the headlines in California's Supreme Court gay marriage decision this week.
So I did not notice the revealing tidbit that Gary Dauphin footnoted a couple of days ago: the Supremes' decision was largely based on the 1948 case Perez v. Sharp, which challenged interracial marriage bans way before Loving v. Virgina (1967) and involved a Mexican American woman and a Black man.
The reason the couple was denied a wedding license and the case went to court was that Andrea Perez was considered "white." Gary posted her picture. I'm re-posting it here. If she's white, I'm downright Aryan.
Like Mendez v. Westminster, the anti-school desegregation case that predated Brown v. Board of Ed by almost a decade, Perez v. Sharp was also a key precedent-setter with Latino plaintiffs that crowbarred the door open to extend fundamental civil rights to others.
Gary argues that it's no coincidence that this case (I would argue both cases) took place in the other state I consider home, California. This supports Roberto Lovato's theory that California is ground zero for Latino-led radical social change in this country.
Yet another instance in which we are erased from the history of fighting for American civil rights, human rights. Been here all along, time to make sure others notice.
And while we're on the subject of law and order let's not forget the equally precedent-setting case of Hernandez v. Texas, a 1954 case argued before the Supreme Court by Gus Garcia, which decided that Mexican Americans and other racial groups had equal protection under the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Garcia's argument was considered by Chief Justice Earl Warren one of the best ever presented before the court. Of course it's been lost. Oh well.




